Quick, someone give me $750
You know my obsession with the movie Earthquake? And Sensurround?
I am going to look into selling my soul for this. Think I can fetch $750 for a used soul?
And no, I have no idea what I would do with a GENUINE MOVIE THEATRE SENSURROUND SUBWOOFER! Except have weekly showings of Earthquake in SENSURROUND in my living room!
Sweet.
Comments
You are SUCH a geek. It's funny either way but...you're completely serious aren't you?
Posted by: Timmer | February 22, 2005 12:32 PM
that'd definitely be cool to have, but honestly, i'd rather have the light-up dance floor from Saturday Night Fever.
Posted by: mikey | February 22, 2005 12:42 PM
First question is does it include the crossovers and amplifiers, or is it just the speaker system (drivers and enclosure)?
Posted by: htom | February 22, 2005 12:52 PM
Dude, that thing is thrashed. I wouldn't pay anywhere near $750 for it. If it was actually worth it, don't you think another movie theater would have bought it up? That thing looks like it was dug up out of someone's backyard.
Posted by: shank | February 22, 2005 01:09 PM
I don't think a Yankee-fan soul is worth any more than $220.
Posted by: Jim S | February 22, 2005 04:40 PM
My guess is that you can get something more modern that has more whoomp-whoomp than that old thing for a lot less.
Posted by: casey | February 22, 2005 05:03 PM
1- Yankee fans have already sold their souls. Sorry.
2- If you were able to purchase this device, would your home stand all those vibrations?
Posted by: joated | February 22, 2005 07:05 PM
I still remember seeing Midway, the second sensurround film.
Those B-25s taking off the deck of the Hornet... they rocked.
Posted by: Dave in Texas | February 22, 2005 08:06 PM
Unfortunately it wouldn't work very effeciently in a living room and you'd need a serious amp to drive it properly. Modern subs are designed to effeciently produce bass in a living room whereas that Cerwin Vega box needs a large room to work properly.
Now that Saturday Night Fever dance floor, that's worth looking at...
Posted by: Scott P | February 23, 2005 08:32 PM
Er, make that efficiently. Twice, please.
Posted by: Scott P | February 23, 2005 08:46 PM