« VRWC: I've got the creds to prove it | Main | ::cue hold music:: »
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Do I need to remind you about the boobies?:
» Postcards from the edge from Shutterblog
http://www.shutterblog.com/developed/exposed/postcardshot_playin_thumb.jpg [Read More]
» Thanks be to Coop from Cold Fury
God, but Michele (who is as big a fan as I am, and is [Read More]
» May I Have Your Attention Please? from I love Jet Noise
Gentlemen: Because I am not an unobservant Tech Wench, it hath come to mine attention that several amongst the male readership have expressed a more than passing interest in the Fair Sex. To be more specific, this interest oft takes [Read More]
» Boob Job from hard times
Despite being a lifelong ass man, today I need to talk to you about boobs. (Jett told me that saying boobs makes Scottish people giggle. Jett giggles when I tell her I'm staying at the Gaylord, but thankfully not the Gaylord Palms.) All of you peopl... [Read More]
Comments
sigh
If my wife knew I was reading a post regarding boobies, she'd probably revoke my blogging privilages.
Posted by: Sharp as a marble | September 28, 2004 08:12 AM
I promised that I wouldn't contribute mine because that would be, like, icky. But I have been talking to some wimmenfolk.
Posted by: Ken Summers | September 28, 2004 08:43 AM
I'm sorry, but I was never good with Flash. How about a simple animated GIF?
Posted by: Laurence Simon | September 28, 2004 09:30 AM
Huh. Huhhh huh.
She said "Boobies".
Huhhhh huh huhhh.
A very worth-while cause that deserves attention, and not just because of the boobie-photos-funny-cracks (Huh. Huhh huh. He said "Crack"), but because there are many, many women facing a hard to detect and scary beast. You know some of these people and they need to know that there is support for finding a cure and improving treatment.
Now, if this were a movement (Huh. Huh. He said "Movement") to raise awareness of PROSTATE cancer, I would not want to see any, um, prostate-like photos. No. None. Not here, not there, not any where. Boobies is good, though, I LIKES to see boobies...
Dan Patterson
Winston-Salem, NC
Posted by: Dan Patterson | September 28, 2004 09:34 AM
Kennedy: I would, ah, like to take this opportunity to announce my fondness for, ah, Michele's boobies. [audience cheers]
Nixon: I'd also like to express, er, my fondness for those particular boobies. [audience grumbles]
Posted by: Jeff Harrell | September 28, 2004 11:18 AM
No one needs to remind me about the boobies. Ever.
Posted by: Tmbmerlin | September 28, 2004 02:00 PM
If my wife knew I was reading a post regarding boobies, she'd probably revoke my blogging privilages.
Ditto...but it's for a good cause, right?
Anyway, for those of you who have been eagerly awaiting this announcement...alas, my boobies will not be making an appearance this year. Your appetites are safe....
Posted by: Jack Cluth | September 28, 2004 03:40 PM
Thank you from the bottom of my heart
Posted by: Sandee | September 28, 2004 05:58 PM
I like "tits." Just can't stop thinking about George Carlin's observation that the word sounded cute, fun. Like a breakfast cereal: Sugar Coated Tits!
Or a nickname: Toots, meet Tits.
Oh, and I second Dan Patterson's comemnts. If a similar program ever runs about prostate cancer, let's skip the prostate related photos, okay? Boobies work fine. So do tits.
Posted by: Steve Skubinna | September 28, 2004 06:01 PM
Having grown up in Louisiana, I can't hear "tits" without thinking "show me your." Which is definitely the right idea, but rarely a good way of expressing it.
"Boobies" has no such connotations for me, though.
Don't get me wrong: there's definitely a time for "tits." I just don't want to be sitting in front of a damn computer screen when that time arrives.
Posted by: Jeff Harrell | September 28, 2004 07:03 PM
Ready to be jealous? I get to say "boobies" and "tits" out loud at work.
It's a magazine about birdwatching, and we have Blue-footed Boobies and Bushtits as well as American Woodcocks in our lexicon (c:
Posted by: A Recovering Liberal | September 28, 2004 08:09 PM