« Oops! | Main | Caption Contest »
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Anyone Home at the New York Post?:
» Whoops from An Unsealed Room
It's got to be interesting in the newsroom of the New York Post this morning. Some reporter is going to get their ass kicked good this morning. I tipped Michele to screen-capture for posterity the picture of the Post headline... [Read More]
» Kerry's Running Mate from Israellycool
It's Gephardt! No, it's Edwards! This is either another Kerry flip-flop, or definitely the last time I take notice of a tabloid newspaper. Update: The NY Post have handled their monumental error in mature fashion - by deleting the original... [Read More]
» NY Post Screws up Kerry VP Pick from Hammer of Truth
I called around and found out that they had changed the headlines at the last minute, not that it mattered. The one they were going to run is on the right.
From their website, a glaring contradiction:
Post Traumatic Stress (large scan inc... [Read More]
» Screenshot from the NY Post\'s SNAFU. (a small victory) from Dummocrats.com
Screenshot from the NY Post\'s SNAFU. (a small victory) [Read More]
Comments
In other news, Dewey Defeats Truman.
Posted by: Dave J | July 6, 2004 09:30 AM
Oops, didn't notice that below. Great minds... ;-)
Posted by: Dave J | July 6, 2004 09:32 AM
Why is it hard to believe this was disinformation released to the NY Post by Kerry's people? That's the first thing that popped into my head when someone pointed the NY Post's reporting earlier this morning.
Posted by: George Berryman | July 6, 2004 09:33 AM
To say that this isn't a disinformation campaign by Kerry against NY POST is as wrong as NY POST to publish incorrect/speculative news.
Wait for the truth to come out on this one. Hopefully, the publisher of the NY POST will investigate and swing the axe where it must.
Posted by: Laurence Simon | July 6, 2004 09:51 AM
I agree with Michele. I can't believe the story either, 'cus we all know it's only Republicans are deceptive and dishonest and use disinformation.
Posted by: JFH | July 6, 2004 10:41 AM
Another thought: If The Post based its "scoop" on information provided by the Kerry campaign on condition sources there not be named, and the information was intentionally wrong, the Post should out the sources who gave the bad info.
The reporter-source relationship on these things is a contract. The reporter provides anonymity in exchange for accurate, truthful information. If the sources broke their end of the contract, the Post has an obligation to itself and its readers to identify the source of the bad info.
Of course, if it was just a reporting screw-up, heads will roll.
Posted by: Ed | July 6, 2004 10:50 AM
It could be a disinformation campaign but it could just as well be The Hee-row acting in character. Remember 'I voted for the $87 billion, before I voted against it'?
I chose Gephart before I chose Edwards.
Posted by: Peter | July 6, 2004 12:01 PM
Laurence, he's goona have to hit himself in the head.
Posted by: TC-LeatherPenguin | July 6, 2004 12:48 PM
I don't think the Post should mind: how many people are going to buy that issue as a collectors item? I bet it's already sold out.
How much does a Dewey Defeats Truman paper sell for? I bet it's a lot. This won't match that, but a lot of people collected Beanie Babies and other useless crap.
Posted by: jon | July 6, 2004 03:59 PM
Tomorrow NY Post headline:
"WE GOT PLAYED!"
Posted by: TC-LeatherPenguin | July 6, 2004 04:21 PM
The Smoking Gun's take on this.
Posted by: insomni | July 6, 2004 05:20 PM