say what?
So, the guy who brought us the twin towers as a swastika now brings us the twin towers as Coke bottles. I'm sure it has something to do with consumerism and America being the land of capitalist pigs but I'm not sure because his writing style is stultifying.
If someone could translate this overwrought paragraph into plain English, perhaps we could understand what Mr. Self-Important Creative Writing Major is saying:
It is unfortunate for us, the conned, the consumer and the consumed, we here ignore the great lessons looming before us -- that, from these telegenically cleansed dead we make increased idolatries to that aggressive propitiation for which they here, experienced but an iota of the full measure of consequence -- that we here blithely empurple these dead through didactic commercialization; that the nation, shall trade platitudes for latitude, so that commodification of the devastation by the government for the corporation, shall forever degrade memory’s worth.
I think he is saying that things go better with Coke. What do you make of it?
Comments
What do I make of it? Print it out and use it to line the bird cage, that's what I make of it.
D
Posted by: David Strain | September 6, 2003 02:34 PM
Did Jesse Jackson ghost-author that?
Empurple?
That sounds like a word more appropriate to bad softcore porn: "He knew if she kept this up for longer, she would empurple his penis."
Somebody call the Thesaurus Police, I think we have an abuser.
Posted by: PhotoDude | September 6, 2003 02:43 PM
I have not the first clue how to translate that trash.
Speaking of "trash," it's pseudo-intellectuals like this that piss us white trash off the most.
I must agree with David. If you have to do something with this drivel, print it out and use it for spare toilet paper.
Posted by: margi | September 6, 2003 02:47 PM
Coca Cola? Swastikas? I wonder if was a reference to this.
Posted by: ScottC | September 6, 2003 02:49 PM
If you say "empurple" in a sort of Billy Crystal-like silly voice (like when he was being a goof in When Harry Met Sally) it is kinda funny. That's about all I got out of his statement, other than that he is a pompous ass who doesn't have a clue what he's saying most of the time.
Posted by: Sharkman | September 6, 2003 03:05 PM
This must be Mark Morford's new apprentice-understudy!
Posted by: Francis W. Porretto | September 6, 2003 03:17 PM
I think most european countries are much less commercially driven than the USA because they don't produce crap worth buying. And when they do, they advertize them here because we have the money to buy the crap. I'm surprised they haven't morphed the towers into a couple of SUV's.
Posted by: Graumagus | September 6, 2003 03:42 PM
Just who is degrading memory's worth again?
Posted by: SondraK | September 6, 2003 03:51 PM
I can sum it up in one word. Tripe.
Posted by: Joe | September 6, 2003 03:56 PM
He's parodying the Gettysburg Address. It is for us the living..., "It is unfortunate for us, the conned..."; ...that from these honored dead we take increased devotion..., "from these telegenically cleansed dead we make increased idolatries...". Et fucking cetera.
Other than that, he's saying that the WTC dead died on the altar of consumerism, that we (well, rather, YOU, of course, not him) are all mindless sheep, and that Arthur C. Clarke's definition of an intellectual (someone educated beyond his intelligence) is not without merit.
Posted by: Angie Schultz | September 6, 2003 04:22 PM
I just wanna barf again.
Posted by: Dave | September 6, 2003 04:30 PM
I, too, am having difficulties contextualizing the dialectic of his discourse. I AM SMART.
Posted by: scott h. | September 6, 2003 04:55 PM
"I think he is saying that things go better with Coke. What do you make of it?"
Due to unseen circumstances and expediting, I hesitate to prognosticate, for fear the essence of my solution to be a fabulous assumption.
IOW, hell if I know.
Posted by: cardeblu | September 6, 2003 05:11 PM
I have no problem with people creating whatever "art" they see fit to make, but at least have a point. "Things go better with Coke" was the first thing I thought of too! Hehe. :)
Posted by: Scott | September 6, 2003 05:13 PM
Looking at this one just made me thirsty for a Coke. Dunno what the intent was.
Posted by: Ian S. | September 6, 2003 05:51 PM
Paragraph? That thing is only ONE sentence long.
Posted by: Shawn | September 6, 2003 06:11 PM
Yeah, I think he was trying to be clever but I wondered why he wanted to advertise coke?
Posted by: Andrew Ian Dodge | September 6, 2003 06:34 PM
Maybe he's a Pepsi man. Either that, or he's remarking on how much happier and fulfilled we'd all be working on collective farms or chopping sugar cane for Comrade Fidel at $1.25 a month and all of the brown rice you can eat. That'd put an end to the horror of all this consumerism, wouldn't it?
Posted by: Jeffersonian | September 6, 2003 06:56 PM
No, he's saying, "Look at me. I'm smarter than all of you. Peons."
Posted by: Meryl Yourish | September 6, 2003 08:51 PM
We could, I suppose, take up a collection to get the period key on his keyboard fixed. It obviously--and I mean this sincerely--doesn't, in fact, work, leaving him to resort--and he has no other choice--to other forms of punctuation; why, exactly, do things go better with Coke, anyway?
Posted by: belize042 | September 6, 2003 09:10 PM
Art Boy missed a trick. Bottles of Mecca Cola would have been much more annoying.
Posted by: bigwig | September 6, 2003 09:11 PM
This is incoherant crap....Typical condescending yammering about the evils of comsumerism. I actually WORK for my living, pay my taxes, meet my finacial obligations, give to charity, help friends/ family in need if necessary..so whatever else I do with my f@#king money is my f@#king business, and as I am not on the US taxpayers dole I do not owe anyone but God an accounting of how many coca colas I buy,especially not this commie.
Posted by: debbie | September 6, 2003 09:30 PM
Well, he wants to push our buttons...but it doesn't really work without a coherent thought. We're pretty much just laughing at his ass.
Wait, it's that intellectual stuff I've been hearing about. You know, how liberal minded folks is all smarter than us and have all these subtle nuances (did I spell that right?) all mixed into their ideas and arguments...things that yore average person just can't comprehend. Oooooeeeee! Dig dis:
"from these telegenically cleansed dead we make increased idolatries to that aggressive propitiation for which they here,"
Nope, my mistake. He's just a dumb ass.
Posted by: dr | September 6, 2003 11:14 PM