« shit or get off the pot | Main | you run ahead, i'll wait here »

i am womyn, hear me roar. or meow.

I am not a women's libber or "feminazi" by any stretch of the imagination. But this - crap like that pisses me off.

On the question of invading Iraq, men really are from Mars and women from Venus. Just as that ancient Roman god and goddess disagreed on matters of war and love, the two sexes are arguing today on whether armed conflict is the answer in Iraq...Women fear for people's lives; they see their children, their husbands, in the line of fire. Bring up the issue of war to many men, and their response is matter-of-fact: Iraqi President Saddam Hussein must be removed from power, and war may be the only option.

I just cannot subscribe to the theory that women are nuturers and men are violence prone by default. Men fear for people's lives as well. They also see thier children and wives in the line of fire.

Women are closer to this issue because we are mothers and we understand when somebody gets killed in a war, that person is a child of one mother and one mother is going to suffer, we understand this in our hearts,'' said [Vidaa] Shahamat, 40.

What? Men don't understand that concept? All I see in articles like this is a bunch of stereotypes at play. Women love, men hate. Women are soft like fluffy cotton, men are hard as nails and plywood.

``Many women are feeling that all of this negative male energy has really taken our country in a direction that feels dangerous to us, especially after Sept. 11,'' said [Medea Benjamin, founder of CodePink], who will stay in Washington until International Women's Day, Saturday. ``We are determined to make the world safer and better for our kids -- and the men who lead this country certainly haven't done it.''

The only negative male energy I feel comes from the direction of bin Laden and Saddam Hussein. And that's more of a terrorism/murderous energy than it is male.

The one theme that I see over and over again with female peace activists is the theme of "women want to make this world a safer place for our children." I wish they would be more specific when they speak about that, say what they really mean. Which is, "We want to make the world safe for the children of our specific country. We don't care about anyone else's." Because if they did, they wouldn't be so quick to put a stop to this war. How is keeping Saddam Hussein in power making the world of Iraqi children safe? Where are the nurturing and motherly insticts for the children of the Hussein regime?

Julie Callahan of Campbell used to be a typical working mom. But she got involved in South Bay Mobilization to Stop the War when the group formed in October. Callahan said she's met people who are involved with the peace movement for a multitude of reasons. But to her, it's about humanity.

``I look at my son when I put him to bed,'' said Callahan, 44, who works for a semiconductor company. ``And I can't help but think how many moms there are in Iraq who put their kids to bed at night and hope they will be all right.''

What's a typical working mom? One that doesn't care about world peace? One that is so involved in her job that she doesn't give a shit about her children? I don't care about humanity because I work yet I haven't joined the peace movement?

I'm tired of article after article stating that the women who are out there protesting the war are noble, are better mothers, are more in touch with their femininity, are going to save the world from the likes of me - a mother who is all-out in favor of the war.

You know what I think of when I put my kids to bed at night? I think of how god damn lucky I am that we haven't been bombarded by more terrorism since 9/11. I think of how horrible it must be to live in a place where you tuck your kids into bed at night and wonder if tomorrow they will be taken away and tortured or murdered or raped, or if they will starve to death because their leader is sitting on millions of dollars and living in a palace while his people go hungry.

What really confuses me about these women is how on one hand, they parade around chanting that women are strong, women are equal to men, women can do whatever men can do. And the next minute they are arguing that women are nicer and more loving and more compassionate than men, that women are better equipped to be mothers and lovers than fighters. Which is it, ladies? Do you want to be womyn who can rule the world or womyn who can paint rainbows across the sky with your piss?

I am a female. I am a mother. And despite the fact that I am not out in Washington D.C. this weekend calling the president a baby killer and waving a socialist flag and chanting "give peace a chance," I am a damn good mother. Yea, I want world peace, too. However, I live in reality and I know the only way to get peace this time around is through force.

TrackBack

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference i am womyn, hear me roar. or meow.:

» http://www.juangato.com/blog/003767.php from Juan Gato's Bucket o' Rants
As a man I realize that I'm incapable of thinking beyond Smash 'n' Fuck as long as the women make [Read More]

» Space travel from Inoperable Terran
Michele is from Mars and liberals have no penis.... [Read More]

» Who would you rather mess with? from pr9000.net ... typing out loud
If the cretins described in this post (from Michele at A Small Victory) were ever exposed to reality, I imagine [Read More]

» Idealizing Woman As Mother from cut on the bias
Michele has a great post about an article admiring anti-war females as women operating from their nurturing, caring feminine core. [Read More]

» We won't target civilan areas from chipstah!
If you can think of a better caption, please let me know.Deadline in a few hours. Time to pray.But the news so far has been pretty good, whether read by Laurie Dhue or some other, lesser anchor. Consider:Thousands of Iraqi troops trying to surrender. E... [Read More]

Comments

One of a mother's MOST important jobs is to PROTECT her children. If, by doing that, she takes up arms and battles any threat, then she is truly being caring.

The author tries to demonstrate her erudition by referring to ancient Roman gods.

I guess her knowledge of the classics doesn't extend to the Greeks, or she would know about Athena...

The author tries to demonstrate her erudition by referring to ancient Roman gods.

I guess her knowledge of the classics doesn't extend to the Greeks, or she would know about Athena...

This is especially funny given that a number of polls show a greater percentage of women supporting the battle in Iraq. I also find it amusing when the feminazis start pushing the same stereotypes that they accuse the right of using.

I agree, Michele, and I'm equally baffled. I've even been told that unless you're the mother of a son, you can't really understand.

[shrug] I guess I don't understand!

I'm the mother of a son and I'm totally confused.

Then again, my son likes to dress in his sister's clothes and listen to Broadway showtunes.

stands up and cheers i love the way you express your beliefs, they echo my feelings, however i don't have the gift for expressing them the way you do, so i'll just continue to read and say "you tell em, girl!"
Oh, and Melly has told me what an amazing momma you are! :)

Aren't men, in the traditional nuclear family unit, supposed to be the ones out earning a living making it safe for their family? Take it back to the Stone Age it has been the same since then. I know that if my children were to go to battle a piece of me would go with them and if they were to fall in battle that a piece of me would die. Does that make me a feminist? Don't think so - I think that makes me a parent. I find it a strange choice of words that GW is called a baby-killer when he is against abortion. Does that mean he wants babies to be born before he has them killed?

I think women are strong, and equal, and can do whatever men can do, and I also think that as a group they can differ in their opinions of war. Every time I've come close to getting into a fight, it's one of my girlfriends who says something that enlightens me - and I realize that they simply seem to understand human behavior better than I do (but that's just my rule of thumb based on anecdotal evidence). Men and women are socialized differently and have different biological influences.

I live in reality too, and even with Bush's wonderful and articulate man-like communication skills, I don't get it.

As a pinko feminazi, I fine the attempt to associate feminist principles with pacifism laughable. It reminds me of the seventies (yes, as Dr. Frank would say, I'm a paleo-feminist) when the women's movement was tying itself in knots differentiating between eroticism (good) and porn (bad).

Crap..."find" not "fine".

Michele, you may be interested to know that the explosives expert who designed the thermobaric bomb was female.

She was from south vietnam, and barely made one of the last boats out. Now she feels she owes the U.S. a debt that she can only begin to repay with her deadly talents.

So, we have the "meek asian girl" stereotype smashed, the "women can
t be warmongers", the "women can't create atrocity as defined by the Left", the "vietnamese hate imperialist America"...

I could go on and on, but why bother?

Humanity can't be pigeonholed by political groups, and expecting women to act in accordance with your rightist OR leftist preconceptions is doomed to fail.

Speaking as a mother and a grandmother, I agree with everything you said. I want my kids and grandkids to be safe too. But I don't think the way to make them safe is to wave some signs around and chant a few slogans and insist that bloody killers won't be bloody killers if we only "talk things through".

As the mother of 3 boys (one a recently discharged Sargent in the Army), I can't understand any woman not understanding that the mothers in Iraq want their children to be safe too. With out the removal of that madman they may never be. A truly loving mother understands and wants to help.

Anybody who subscribes to the theory that men and women are identical in absolutely everything except their reproductive equpiment is deluding themselves. There are real differences, they are inborn, they are natural, and they are furthermore a good thing, a benefit to humanity.

That being said, there is nothing more absurd than the notion that somehow women are in tune with some natural rhythm or universal energy that makes their spirit cry "No War!" The martial values ARE nurturing values--duty, self-sacrifice, honor, and so on. Do women not have these instincts as well? These are the values that defend and preserve our civilization, for God's sake. Patting a child on the head and reading him a bedtime story is nurturing, but so is grabbing a shotgun when an intruder comes. Women in America generally do not fail either test, so all of this foolishness just goes that much further to alienating feminists from real women everywhere.

Anyone who had a mother should know better than to say that women aren't tough. My mother was a lot slower to anger than my dad, but my brother and I learned quickly that when Mom got mad, it was time to take cover.

For those who argue that George Bush's war is just going to kill Iraqi babies, I ask the following: Do you think that Iraqi babies should die like God intended, by starvation or curable illness, because Saddam Hussein will not allow them to be fed or treated by medicine? I'm a mom whose son, now 12, learned to crawl on carpet in Dhahran, Saudi Arabia, under a plume of oil smoke from the wells Saddam Hussein blew up in Kuwait. Whenever I picked up my crawling baby, his arms and legs would be completely covered in oil soot, and I would have to bathe him to keep him from ingesting too much of it. A man who can have that sort of hissy fit and cause one of the worst ecological disasters in history, needs to be fitted for a casket. He'll do it again, even worse, if he has a chance.

But, then again, maybe I just need more estrogen...

Please tell me that the CodePink founder's name isn't really Medea. That's just too rich.

I was scrolling down, getting ready to compose my own comment. But Sage said it better than I could.

So, nice post Michelle. Amen to you and to Sage.

Gotta go tuck my lucky kids into bed now.

I've always detested this "women are peaceful, nonconfrontational, nurturing gaia mother goddesses" drivel spouted from the girly-girl branch of feminism. I'm a quite average early twenties woman, kind but not the least bit nurturing, ultracompetitive, aggressive and feminine. I wear Hello Kitty pajamas and play a damn good game of Jedi Knight.
So Medea (truly an unfortunate name, eh RR Ryan?) and 'Code Pink' can take their offensive, medieval stereotypes and shove 'em.

The Medea Benjamins and the Julie Callahans, with
their "difference" feminism, are making the case
that women, at least as the difference feminists
define them, are unqualified to be police officers,
Navy pilots, Federal judges, or Presidents because
as part of their jobs they are required to at times
apply deadly force against someone else's child,
whether it is pulling a trigger, upholding a death
sentence, or ordering US troops into battle.

And, frankly, Julie Callahan of Campbell, CA strikes
me as the kind of cretin who thinks they're a better
person because they drive a Volvo. What a self-
regarding loon.

God save the idiot who gets between a mother bear and her cub or a lioness and her cub... The lion might kill you for food but the lioness will kill to protect her cubs... Women are hardly softies. I admire a women who will take a stand for what she believes. On the other hand, women who are standing up for Saddam's right to keep his rape camp and torture centers are just ignorant idiots. ("Ignorant Idiot; Noun. 1. A person who does not know and cannot be told." - John Brunner - "The Sheep Look Up"

Ed. note: There used to be a very long comment/poem here, but seeing as that Tamara has her own blog, I thought you might want to read it over there instead of having it take up all that space here.

here

I am the mother of two sons and I am hugely in favor of this war. So I guess I am ignoble and 'do not understand'.

Once in a while, you read something you wish you'd written. I wish I'd written this piece. Glad you wrote it, though, it needed to be said.

The sad thing is that these people can find a forum for this pure s**t. It's nonsense that men and women are different when it comes to protecting their children. Or anyone else's.

I wish I had the time to type everything I wanted to add, but essentially I would just be redundant to your purpose so I am going to say great job! I am with you on this on.

gah. sputter. pfft. cant think of anything to say that ain't already been said here. h

By inferance you imply that men don't care about their childrens lives?
Why else are we going to war? The peacenics say don't go to war to because innocents will be killed, but when it's all over I think that the facts will show that Sodamn Insane killed more innocents in one week then will have been the unfortunate collateral damage of war.

By inferance you imply that men don't care about their childrens lives?
Why else are we going to war? The peacenics say don't go to war to because innocents will be killed, but when it's all over I think that the facts will show that Sodamn Insane killed more innocents in one week then will have been the unfortunate collateral damage of war.

Hello,

I was recently observing a feminist talking bad about men (something men do not do in public) and I was so distraught by her statements that it got me to wondering about what good women are to all humanity.

I see the men of America. They do not complain, certainly not as much or often as the women. Men serve their country. They actually give up their life for their country,their family,their freedom that their forefathers also gave their lives for.

Men serve with all they have and, ..... all they ever will have.

Do women serve their country?

They do not serve their country with equality if they are not part of the draft.

Therefor, is it not selfishly wrong and undeserving for women to have the right to vote - since their rights were given to them - and the rights of men were fought and died for?

Women do not have to be drafted and blown to pieces and shot dead on the front lines.

Women should themsleves discuss the option of relinquishing their man given right to vote.

Perhaps women should ask themselves how they can live with themsleves each morning when they wake up. They see a young man being shot to death in his duty to protect his country - her. And yet women do not insist they themselves be drafted and serve - or - if not drafted - then continue to insist on the right to vote?

Patheticism. That is the perfect word for feminism.

For example, a feminist woman basketball coach stated in NEWSWEEK,

"History will occur when institutions actually hire a woman to coach a men's team and give her all the opportunities to build a program."

Give, Give, Give.

There are many in this country who feel that:

"History will occur when American female high school students choose vocational trades instead of cosmetology."

And,

"History will occur when an equal number of American women apply for oil field drilling positions, waste management positions, jet mechanic positions, studio and live musician positions, chess champion positions, architects, etc., etc., etc., etc.

1920 was a long time ago. So, was the 1960's when women really began to preach their 'cause' that women can do anything a man can do. So, why aren't American women doing anything a man can do?

And certainly,

History will be made when there are as many patents applied for inventions by American women as there are by American men.

Inventions. A pondering subject.

What do women invent?

They have had plenty of time - since 1920 (and the clock just keeps on ticking) and still nearly zero....... zero ........ serious inventions to show for. Inventions that contribute to all humanity are things that are needed by and contribute to all humanity - men,women,children, the disabled,and the elderly. All the inventions one can see on television or in magazines are by - men. Who is preventing women from inventing? Sure, American women can do anything a man can do - but - do they?

So she is the first woman to do this - she is the first woman to do that. Are we all becoming just a tad bit bored with the first midget to do this or to do that? What are women? Are women freaks at a freak show or something?

And really, why do women crave and rave and pant to do any and all things men do?

Do men crave to do any one thing women do? hmmmm.

And, what's this all about:

In a recent television interview, the president of National Organization for Women declared that women are nothing more than window dressing. What is going on here?

These things and the statement made by the NOW
'president' should certainly be an alert to all feminists and the producers of the PBS broadcast of 'If Women Ruled the World', Victorias Secret board of directors, iVillage members, Madonna, Britney Spears, anchors and guests of 'To the Contrary', anchors and guests of 'For Women Only', the National Organization for Women, the West Wing televsion show, Agusta National Golf Club, and the 'person' who coined the phrase,

" A woman needs a man like a fish needs a bicycle."

Let me just say now that, I for one do not consider myself to be a Democrat or a Republican.

Although I personally can not stand Michael Jackson
(because he has a license to steal the childhood of a
child by being a child molester), and I definitely
appreciate low taxes and a cutting in half of the
capital gains tax and employers rights and am
anti-affirmative action, I am not a Republican.

And although I absolutely believe in clean air and the
most rapid phase-out of petroleum fueled cars,
national health insurance and labor unions, I am not a
Democrat - especially since I aboslutely do not
believe in feminism - as more and more Americans are
beginning to feel the same.

One of these days I will believe in feminism - when
there are as many women truck drivers and oilfield
workers and jet mechanics and live/ and/ or/studio
musicians .........

(and girls like Britney Spears and Jennifer Lopez and
Anvril and the has-been and aging old Madonna who
never write the songs or the music - instead, they
only sing and dance with belly skin and other skin
exposed, acting like a civilized prostitute - just the
same old cheap,sleazy 'i am a woman - i am all about
sex and skin' and 'if you have enough money, you can
buy me - i am a woman - i am for sale' image),
............

electricians, architects, .... inventors .... and
..... etc, etc.,etc., etc., etc.,.... as there are:

MEN.

(Speaking of inventions - women have been liberated
for about 50 years now - and the question is ....
after 50 years .... where are women's inventions?)

(Women's lack of countless important inventions which
contribute to all humanity proves that men are 2 times
smarter than women. Men are about as good with
relations as women: 50% divorce rate, women hate other
women, women hate themselves, etc. Men love children
as much as women (men love children enough to allow
them to live with their mother after she leaves their
father because he is no longer exciting - and he
actually pays money every month to not be able to live
with his children - the divorcer gets to live with the
kids and also receive a monthly check which is not
spent only on the children as everyone knows). Men
overall are liked and accepted more than women which
says much about relations as well. So, men and women
are basically equal in the area of 'relations.'

Yet, in addition to relations, men also have
mechanical abilities which attribute to their
inventions and building of everything from automatic
transmissions to spacecraft to the invention of the
internet (which took women years to become active in -
following the men, of course, as always) to the
building of a house to the invention and manufacturing
of ....... everything that women see with their eyes -
no matter where they are standing or sleeping or
looking - in this deservingly man's world - everything
they see is by the hands and minds of .... men.

But are women smart? Certainly they are. Women are
smart like the con-artist on the street corner - the
same type of manipulating, conning, and crooked
intelligence - whereby the con-artist takes - and
never gives. Women never contribute to all humanity
with their type of intelligence. Women do not invent.
Over 95% of inventions are by men - and 99.9% of all
imortant inventions for the benfit of all humanity
(seniors, men, women,children, and the disabled) are
by the hands and minds of men.

And there are no excuses for this gulf between men
and women - because girls choose to enter cosmetology
or nursing or office management in high school - while
the boys do not cheat society by their humbley
choosing football (which should be banned) and outside work and warehouse work. And,even during school, as girls falsely hug each other in front of the boys only to make a feminist show in front of the boys to let them know that high school is the first step in a life-long war against the men in a country where the minds of brilliant men forged a constitution - one more thing
women have never done - the boys are judged by the
girls as lower and not in their league. Even if a
woman is a waitress, she is making more money than the cook and the busboy. Everyone knows this.

And after high school, if a woman does not go to
college, she often marries a man who is a plumber or
painter or mechanic or oil field worker or petroleum
plant worker or fertilizer worker or logger or heavy
equipment operator and she knows well that her husband
often goes to work and gets injured on the job (even
with just cuts and bruises and bashes).And if a person
asks her where her husband is, she will say - "He is
out making me money." She certainly shows her internal
appreciation for him and his hard and dangerous and
hot and cold, underpaying work.

Men take these entry-level jobs because they pay more
on day 1 than large corporations pay for inside work
on day 1.

And, he has to have as much money as possible for the
woman - or he will not obtain (buy) or keep the woman.
It is safe to say that hardly any woman would even go
out with a man if he tells her up front that she will
be required to pay for her movie ticket, her
movie-popcorn, her restaurant meal and drink, and 1/2
of the restaurant tip.

But the woman on the other hand, has security with her
husband, and, she looks for and finds safe, inside
work at a large corporation such as a telephone
company. After about 15 years on the job, the woman is
making more money than her husband because she is
working at a large corporation and she is still
complaining about a glass ceiling.

It is clear that early on, women choose to cheat on
their obligation to genuinely contribute to humanity
on an equal basis as men. Women avoid ugly work places
such as warehouses and highways and tall steel
buidings and clean-up of construction sites and oil
field work and jet mechanics and garbage pick-up and
sewer plants and so many many other ugly jobs.

Women want equality only in a pretty office.

Honestly, I would really have more respect for women
even if a woman just becomes the world champion chess
player - not the Women's champion chess player - but
the world champion chess player - the #1 - the real
thing.And, really, why is there women's chess anyway?
Chess is not physical competition - it is mental ....
as in -

National Security against .... terrorism.

The most important thing as President and
Congressman and Governor - is the National Security of
our nation.

Since women can not even sit down at a table and use
their double brain power to defeat a man in a game of
chess - which in reality is a war game - then how can
she be qualified to be president or governor?

Even if and when a woman becomes President of the
United States of America, what then? There will be
just as many or maybe even more problems in the United
States of America as there were when she was elected.
This is very easily proven by looking at the before
and after statistics of an individual state such as
Pennsylvania and Texas - after those females were
voted out of office.

The primary reason women want to be president is for
attention and to give them a purpose for existing and
also just to be able to say, "See, we told you so,
women can do anything a man can do."

As much as I am against feminism, due to their
squeeky mouth (which got the grease in the past but
may not in the near future - feminism peaked in 2000
and is dying a slow but certain death), there are 2
things I wish feminists would tell all republicans and
any person who is against national health insurance
and petroleum fueled cars:

1. Government of the people, by the people, and
for the people. How can our goverment be for the
people when 40,000,000 citizens are not treated
equal at the hospital?

(National health insurance is not national health
care that is common in Canada, Britain, Germany,
etc.National Health Insurance would still require the
patient to pay 20% out of pocket. The competetive
race for medical cures, medical machines and devices,
inventions, patents, research trials,etc., would not
change if the US Government merely pays for health
insurance for every citizen. the US Government
believes the people are incapable of providing
personal retirement for themselves so the US
Government invented Social Security. It is clear
that with 42,000,000 people not being treated equally
at the hospital soley because of not having medical
insurance, the people are incapable of providing
themselves health insurance, the US Goverment should
invent National Health Insurance Security).

2. Since breathing enough carbon monoxide from a
car exhaust will kill a person, surely the amount
we breath in every day causes millions of Americans
to have health problems. It just makes common since.

Republicans should know that national health
insurance was not thought up by Bill Clinton. This
issue was debated in the 1950's by Huhbert Humphrey.

We need National Health Insurance Security and clean
air to breath.

Now, back to the American Feminist female issue.


Question:

Where were our caring and faithful and brave
American women at Ground Zero during the dangerous
clean up and saving of victims?Where are the female
iron workers? Those male iron workers did all that
work
for ............................ zero pay.

HEROES. REAL PEOPLE. FIRST CLASS PEOPLE.

Not second place people.

And let's talk a little about men creating and being
responsible for the wars. The fact is, war has
killed less than 1% of all humans who ever existed.
Will womYn ever use the other side of their double
minded brain to consider that 13,000 children die
every day just from infections and unclean drinking
water? What about historical famine? What about
historical plagues? What about cancer? What about
cardiac arrest -teenagers have heart attacks,too.
Child lukemia? Brain tumors? Aneurisms? Strokes?
Diabetis? What about job accidents - which women are
no part of. What about car accidents (did men invent
air bags)? What about murder - by men and poisoning
murder and hired murder and pistol murder by women and
women running people over with their car? Did Hillary
vote for war?

Yes, Hillary voted for war - and she has before as she
ordered her husband to use military force in Bosnia.

What about Nancy, the new Democratic minority leader?
Did she vote for a resolution of war? No.

But, now that she is minority leader of the House, she
says she will back our President. What a soiled
panty-waist wus with a double mind.

What about hurricanes? What about floods? What about
earthquakes? The list goes on. American women, if they
want to 'really' be liked and 'really' be accepted,
should stop pointing fingers at men for war which has
killed hardly anybody compared to .... mother nature.

The truth is, men do far far far more good than
evil.

Penicilin. How many lives have been saved by the man
who invented penicillin - and the men who prescribe
it? Answer: More people than have ever been killed in
war.

The light bulb, the internet, cars, fans,
elevators, airplanes, ships to discover the new
world, space craft to land on the moon,
air-conditioning, outer space with telescopes and
probes space ships, calculus, algebra, clocks,
telephone, homes, money, - and farming to feed all of
us and inventions to keep us all employed (inventions:
men account for over 95% of all human inventions - and
of the less than 5% of the other inventions have been
by women and are largely in the area of fashion, baby
items, special mops, special cardboard clothes
folders, etc. - nearly zero products or medicine to
save the lives of all humanity and contribute to all
humanity which again is defines as Seniors, Men,
Women, Children, and the Disabled.

So the question must now be asked and answered:

How many human lives have men saved with their
countless inventions such as heart/lung machine,
kidney dialysis machine, the heating element, the heat
exchanger, medicine (and the men who correctly
prescribe the men-made medicine), air-conditioning,
cars, (to get a person to the hospital quickly), water
purification, helicopters for emergency flight, Doplar
radar, airplanes for emergency flight, eyeglasses,
pacemakers, anesthesia, surgery, etc. etc. etc. X
1000?

The list of inventions men have used to save human
lives goes and on and on and on and on. The list of
inventions women have used saved lives is virtually
zero.

Therefor, in reality (one of women's most hated words)

War is a drop in the bucket compared to the lives men
have saved in the past - and the lives men continue to
save every day the sun rises.

A real and true and honest description of women is
that women are:

The World's Cheaters.

Women do not choose or do the careers men do because
women are either too proud, too lazy, too scared,
too vindictive, too bitter, or too stupid. So, here we
see women not contributing to all humanity.

And with virtually no inventions - again we see that
women absolutely do not contribute to all humanity.

A man goes to work every day for himself, his wife,
and their children - and it is their children - not
just hers. Men have always done this since the
beginning of civilization.

Women have always worked, but it was usually at home
or selling in markets (not just their bodies). So, the
later part of the 20th century should be of no
surprise not should it be glorified. Women have always
worked, albeit they were usually older women whose
children had grown or widowed women or women who were
single without children or women who were married
without children.

But, the statistics show that from the beginning of
civilization to as late as 1905 A.D., 95% of women
with a child stayed home to be with their children and
home-schooled them for intellignece and took them to
church and other social events to develop the child's
social skills.

Then later on in the 20th century, women started
working outside the home. It is now known that women
go to work every day for themselves and the children.
A woman does not have her man in mind as she works.

Women do not really love men. The Titanic proved this
without doubt. Men really do care. Men care more. They
give their lives for women. They always have. And
women turn their heads and change the subject when it
comes to men giving their lives for their woman - and
women never giving their life for their man.

Men even put up with PMS and constant complaining and
defaming and screaming - even though they have the
absolute power to place a woman in prison for these
blood pressure raising acts of patheticism (womens
blood pressure does not rise during domestic arguing).

A woman tells a man she loves him. But then she has
children and her love for him was only superficial.

She soon finds that she just wants to work and be
with the kids. She thinks to herself and receives the
advice of her peers and the conclusion for the
solution is,
__________________________

Dear man,

Thank you for giving me children. But,goodbye,man. All
men are bastards. A woman needs a man like a fish
needs a bicycle. And the kids will be okay without a
father. Women and children need a man like fish needs
a bicycle - even though research has proven otherwise.

___________________________


If a person believes in the bible, it is quite obvious
that feminism began in the garden of Eden when Eve was
away from her husband by choice.

And then the root of feminism expanded on a larger
scale when men invented the automobile.

And then came the latter half of the 20th century.

Women in the 20th century invented Complete Womyns
Lib.

*****

Women's Lib = Complete Women's Liberation =

Womyns Liberation Organization =

opposing army =

sleeping with the enemy.

*****

Eve actually had paradise ..... paradise .....

but she even in paradise - the she was not content.

Women are always behind (and copycats)- WNBA
(basketball), women's billiards, women's chess,
women's golf (and they are so against all an male golf
club - where men could not care less about an all
woman golf club), women's auxillary this and women's
auxillary that, etc.

When will women invent something on their own and
stop being a copycat? Answer: In reality....never.

And the issue of Men's Clubs. Second class is obvious
since men ..... never never never ... ever .... want
to join women's clubs.

But women just pant and rave for inclusion in the boys
treehouse.

Women complain and complain and complain and pant and
pant and pant to get on the football sidelines, the
all male locker-room, and anywhere else a boys club or
boys treehouse is.

Is this pathetisim?

Is this second class?

Is this an inferiority complex?

American women should take a good look in the mirror.
The finger pointing should begin in the mirror.

On earth there are producers ..... and there are
complainers. Producers are too busy producing to
complain. Complainers are too busy complaining to
produce.

American women should really and truly practice a
respect for men and face the truth - women are not
equal. Women were never equal were in the past - and
they never will be in the future - unless of course
the hands and minds of men find a cure for the second
team double minded inferior complexed.

Hollywood - is not reality. Just ask China the female
wrestler - who worked out every day - a world renowned
athlete - she got her butt kicked by 46 year fat,
overweight, out of shape, horribly unpopular old Joey
Butafuco in a boxing match on Celebrity Boxing. She
got man-handled by a pathetically out of shape and
over-weight loser. Again, she is a world renowned
athlete in perfect physical shape. And she is not a
small woman. She is tall with muscles and she shows
(or did until after boxing match) those muscles off
every time she gets in front of a camera.

And speaking of boxing? The truth is (and truth is a
woman's worst enemy and a non-topic and a reason for
frightened female scorn if mentioned), if a women does
win in boxing - never in Karate or ultimate fighting -
then it is because there are only 6 rounds of boxing.
Any 'body' - can swing padded boxing gloves for 6
rounds. And, really, men do not feel comfortable
boxing a woman. The truth is, 95% of all 20 year old
women can not defeat 95% of all 50 year old men if it
becomes serious. Battered Women's shelters prove this
when their records are examined.

There are no Battered Men's Shelters.

What part of this reality do women not understand?

Men hit with their fists.

Women hit with words.And women's mouths get them in
trouble with men. In your face is the reason there are
battered women's shelters.

Without question, men should go to jail for hitting
women.

But, since boys are taught on the school grounds to
not hit girls, little girls should be taught to not
lift their voice to boys.

And without question, women should go to jail for
getting in a man's face.

This would save many marriages and deaths from heart
attacks and violence.

If given a choice, men would not become a woman for
all the money, and diamonds, and gold that could be
found on all the earth.

To the contrary, women go to the ends of the earth to
try to act, talk, dress, and even be a man. And they
would give anything if only they could have been born
a man.

Perhaps women should stop complaining about those
types of 'persons' that women themselves dream and
crave of being.

Feminism is a lie.

Women can not do anything a man can do - and because
they do not - this is proof that they can not.

Feminism is built on the sands of popularism.

The tide is washing away feminism.

Decade by decade - we see the non-contributions of
women to humanity.

Little by little we see through the facade - the
fakery - mask.

What is behind the mask?

A joyless person.

A loveless person.

A cheater. A complainer. A lier. A hater. A killer. A
pervert. A creep. A judger. A lazy. A pouter. A taker.

A non-deserver.

A second place person.

A pathetic.

Men rule the world.

Women do not rule - nor do they deserve to.

And, women do not deserve the right to vote.

They are not allowed to be drafted.

They are not allowed to vote.

This is fairness and integrity.

Women: No Draft - No Vote

Hello,

The men of America. They do not complain. They serve their country. They die for their country.

Men serve with all they have and all they ever will have.

Do women serve their country?

They do not serve their country if they are not part of the draft.

Therefor, it is very wrong and undeserving for women to have the right to vote - since their rights were given to them - and the rights of men were fought and died for.

Women do not have to be drafted and blown to pieces and shot dead on the front lines.

Women should themsleves give up their man given right to vote.

How can women live with themsleves each morning when they wake up? They see a young man being shot to death in his duty to protect his country - her. And yet women do not insist they themselves be drafted and serve - or - if not drafted - then continue to insist on the right to vote?

Patheticism. Look at how American women are:

A woman basketball coach recently stated,

"History will occur when institutions actually hire a woman to coach a men's team and give her all the opportunities to build a program."

Give, Give, Give.

There are many in this country who feel that:

"History will occur when American female high school students choose vocational trades instead of cosmetology."

And,

"History will occur when an equal number of American women apply for oil field drilling positions, waste management positions, jet mechanic positions, studio and live musician positions, chess champion positions, architects, etc., etc., etc., etc. 1920 was a long time ago. So, was the 1960's when women really began to preach their 'cause' that women can do anything a man can do. So, why aren't American women doing anything a man can do?

And certainly,

History will be made when there are as many patents applied for inventions by American women as there are by American men.

Inventions. A pondering subject.

What do women invent?

They have had plenty of time - since 1920 (and the clock just keeps on ticking) and still nearly zero....... zero ........ serious inventions to show for. Inventions that contribute to all humanity are things that are needed by and contribute to all humanity - men,women,children, the disabled,and the elderly. All the inventions one can see on television or in magazines are by - men. Who is preventing women from inventing? Sure, American women can do anything a man can do - but - do they?

So she is the first woman to do this - she is the first woman to do that. Are we all becoming just a tad bit bored with the first midget to do this or to do that? What are women? Are women freaks at a freak show or something?

And really, why do women crave and rave and pant to do any and all things men do?

Do men crave to do any ONE thing women do? hmmmm.

And, what's this all about:

In a recent television interview, the president of National Organization for Women declared that women are nothing more than window dressing. What is going on here?

These things and the statement made by the NOW
'president' should certainly be an alert to all feminists and the producers of the PBS broadcast of 'If Women Ruled the World', Victorias Secret board of directors, iVillage members, Madonna, Britney Spears, anchors and guests of 'To the Contrary', anchors and guests of 'For Women Only', the National Organization for Women, the West Wing televsion show, Agusta National Golf Club, and the 'person' who coined the phrase,

" A woman needs a man like a fish needs a bicycle."

Let me just say now that, I for one do not consider myself to be a Democrat or a Republican.

Although I personally can not stand Michael Jackson
(because he has a license to steal the childhood of a
child by being a child molester), and I definitely
appreciate low taxes and a cutting in half of the
capital gains tax and employers rights and am
anti-affirmative action, I am not a Republican.

And although I absolutely believe in clean air and the
most rapid phase-out of petroleum fueled cars,
national health insurance and labor unions, I am not a
Democrat - especially since I aboslutely do not
believe in feminism - as more and more Americans are
beginning to feel the same.

One of these days I will believe in feminism - when
there are as many women truck drivers and oilfield
workers and jet mechanics and live/ and/ or/studio
musicians .........

(and girls like Britney Spears and Jennifer Lopez and
Anvril and the has-been and aging old Madonna who
never write the songs or the music - instead, they
only sing and dance with belly skin and other skin
exposed, acting like a civilized prostitute - just the
same old cheap,sleazy 'i am a woman - i am all about
sex and skin' and 'if you have enough money, you can
buy me - i am a woman - i am for sale' image),
............

electricians, architects, .... inventors .... and
..... etc, etc.,etc., etc., etc.,.... as there are:

MEN.

(Speaking of inventions - women have been liberated
for about 50 years now - and the question is ....
after 50 years .... where are women's inventions?)

(Women's lack of countless important inventions which
contribute to all humanity proves that men are 2 times
smarter than women. Men are about as good with
relations as women: 50% divorce rate, women hate other
women, women hate themselves, etc. Men love children
as much as women (men love children enough to allow
them to live with their mother after she leaves their
father because he is no longer exciting - and he
actually pays money every month to not be able to live
with his children - the divorcer gets to live with the
kids and also receive a monthly check which is not
spent only on the children as everyone knows). Men
overall are liked and accepted more than women which
says much about relations as well. So, men and women
are basically equal in the area of 'relations.'

Yet, in addition to relations, men also have
mechanical abilities which attribute to their
inventions and building of everything from automatic
transmissions to spacecraft to the invention of the
internet (which took women years to become active in -
following the men, of course, as always) to the
building of a house to the invention and manufacturing
of ....... everything that women see with their eyes -
no matter where they are standing or sleeping or
looking - in this deservingly man's world - everything
they see is by the hands and minds of .... men.

But are women smart? Certainly they are. Women are
smart like the con-artist on the street corner - the
same type of manipulating, conning, and crooked
intelligence - whereby the con-artist takes - and
never gives. Women never contribute to all humanity
with their type of intelligence. Women do not invent.
Over 95% of inventions are by men - and 99.9% of all
imortant inventions for the benfit of all humanity
(seniors, men, women,children, and the disabled) are
by the hands and minds of men.

And there are no excuses for this gulf between men
and women - because girls choose to enter cosmetology
or nursing or office management in high school - while
the boys do not cheat society by their humbley
choosing football (which should be banned) and outside work and warehouse work. And,even during school, as girls falsely hug each other in front of the boys only to make a feminist show in front of the boys to let them know that high school is the first step in a life-long war against the men in a country where the minds of brilliant men forged a constitution - one more thing
women have never done - the boys are judged by the
girls as lower and not in their league. Even if a
woman is a waitress, she is making more money than the cook and the busboy. Everyone knows this.

And after high school, if a woman does not go to
college, she often marries a man who is a plumber or
painter or mechanic or oil field worker or petroleum
plant worker or fertilizer worker or logger or heavy
equipment operator and she knows well that her husband
often goes to work and gets injured on the job (even
with just cuts and bruises and bashes).And if a person
asks her where her husband is, she will say - "He is
out making me money." She certainly shows her internal
appreciation for him and his hard and dangerous and
hot and cold, underpaying work.

Men take these entry-level jobs because they pay more
on day 1 than large corporations pay for inside work
on day 1.

And, he has to have as much money as possible for the
woman - or he will not obtain (buy) or keep the woman.
It is safe to say that hardly any woman would even go
out with a man if he tells her up front that she will
be required to pay for her movie ticket, her
movie-popcorn, her restaurant meal and drink, and 1/2
of the restaurant tip.

But the woman on the other hand, has security with her
husband, and, she looks for and finds safe, inside
work at a large corporation such as a telephone
company. After about 15 years on the job, the woman is
making more money than her husband because she is
working at a large corporation and she is still
complaining about a glass ceiling.

It is clear that early on, women choose to cheat on
their obligation to genuinely contribute to humanity
on an equal basis as men. Women avoid ugly work places
such as warehouses and highways and tall steel
buidings and clean-up of construction sites and oil
field work and jet mechanics and garbage pick-up and
sewer plants and so many many other ugly jobs.

Women want equality only in a pretty office.

Honestly, I would really have more respect for women
even if a woman just becomes the world champion chess
player - not the Women's champion chess player - but
the world champion chess player - the #1 - the real
thing.And, really, why is there women's chess anyway?
Chess is not physical competition - it is mental ....
as in -

National Security against .... terrorism.

The most important thing as President and
Congressman and Governor - is the National Security of
our nation.

Since women can not even sit down at a table and use
their double brain power to defeat a man in a game of
chess - which in reality is a war game - then how can
she be qualified to be president or governor?

Even if and when a woman becomes President of the
United States of America, what then? There will be
just as many or maybe even more problems in the United
States of America as there were when she was elected.
This is very easily proven by looking at the before
and after statistics of an individual state such as
Pennsylvania and Texas - after those females were
voted out of office.

The primary reason women want to be president is for
attention and to give them a purpose for existing and
also just to be able to say, "See, we told you so,
women can do anything a man can do."

As much as I am against feminism, due to their
squeeky mouth (which got the grease in the past but
may not in the near future - feminism peaked in 2000
and is dying a slow but certain death), there are 2
things I wish feminists would tell all republicans and
any person who is against national health insurance
and petroleum fueled cars:

1. Government of the people, by the people, and
for the people. How can our goverment be for the
people when 40,000,000 citizens are not treated
equal at the hospital?

(National health insurance is not national health
care that is common in Canada, Britain, Germany,
etc.National Health Insurance would still require the
patient to pay 20% out of pocket. The competetive
race for medical cures, medical machines and devices,
inventions, patents, research trials,etc., would not
change if the US Government merely pays for health
insurance for every citizen. the US Government
believes the people are incapable of providing
personal retirement for themselves so the US
Government invented Social Security. It is clear
that with 42,000,000 people not being treated equally
at the hospital soley because of not having medical
insurance, the people are incapable of providing
themselves health insurance, the US Goverment should
invent National Health Insurance Security).

2. Since breathing enough carbon monoxide from a
car exhaust will kill a person, surely the amount
we breath in every day causes millions of Americans
to have health problems. It just makes common since.

Republicans should know that national health
insurance was not thought up by Bill Clinton. This
issue was debated in the 1950's by Huhbert Humphrey.

We need National Health Insurance Security and clean
air to breath.

Now, back to the American Feminist female issue.


Question:

Where were our caring and faithful and brave
American women at Ground Zero during the dangerous
clean up and saving of victims?Where are the female
iron workers? Those male iron workers did all that
work
for ............................ zero pay.

HEROES. REAL PEOPLE. FIRST CLASS PEOPLE.

Not second place people.

And let's talk a little about men creating and being
responsible for the wars. The fact is, war has
killed less than 1% of all humans who ever existed.
Will womYn ever use the other side of their double
minded brain to consider that 13,000 children die
every day just from infections and unclean drinking
water? What about historical famine? What about
historical plagues? What about cancer? What about
cardiac arrest -teenagers have heart attacks,too.
Child lukemia? Brain tumors? Aneurisms? Strokes?
Diabetis? What about job accidents - which women are
no part of. What about car accidents (did men invent
air bags)? What about murder - by men and poisoning
murder and hired murder and pistol murder by women and
women running people over with their car? Did Hillary
vote for war?

Yes, Hillary voted for war - and she has before as she
ordered her husband to use military force in Bosnia.

What about Nancy, the new Democratic minority leader?
Did she vote for a resolution of war? No.

But, now that she is minority leader of the House, she
says she will back our President. What a soiled
panty-waist wus with a double mind.

What about hurricanes? What about floods? What about
earthquakes? The list goes on. American women, if they
want to 'really' be liked and 'really' be accepted,
should stop pointing fingers at men for war which has
killed hardly anybody compared to .... mother nature.

The truth is, men do far far far more good than
evil.

Penicilin. How many lives have been saved by the man
who invented penicillin - and the men who prescribe
it? Answer: More people than have ever been killed in
war.

The light bulb, the internet, cars, fans,
elevators, airplanes, ships to discover the new
world, space craft to land on the moon,
air-conditioning, outer space with telescopes and
probes space ships, calculus, algebra, clocks,
telephone, homes, money, - and farming to feed all of
us and inventions to keep us all employed (inventions:
men account for over 95% of all human inventions - and
of the less than 5% of the other inventions have been
by women and are largely in the area of fashion, baby
items, special mops, special cardboard clothes
folders, etc. - nearly zero products or medicine to
save the lives of all humanity and contribute to all
humanity which again is defines as Seniors, Men,
Women, Children, and the Disabled.

So the question must now be asked and answered:

How many human lives have men saved with their
countless inventions such as heart/lung machine,
kidney dialysis machine, the heating element, the heat
exchanger, medicine (and the men who correctly
prescribe the men-made medicine), air-conditioning,
cars, (to get a person to the hospital quickly), water
purification, helicopters for emergency flight, Doplar
radar, airplanes for emergency flight, eyeglasses,
pacemakers, anesthesia, surgery, etc. etc. etc. X
1000?

The list of inventions men have used to save human
lives goes and on and on and on and on. The list of
inventions women have used saved lives is virtually
zero.

Therefor, in reality (one of women's most hated words)

War is a drop in the bucket compared to the lives men
have saved in the past - and the lives men continue to
save every day the sun rises.

A real and true and honest description of women is
that women are:

The World's Cheaters.

Women do not choose or do the careers men do because
women are either too proud, too lazy, too scared,
too vindictive, too bitter, or too stupid. So, here we
see women not contributing to all humanity.

And with virtually no inventions - again we see that
women absolutely do not contribute to all humanity.

A man goes to work every day for himself, his wife,
and their children - and it is their children - not
just hers. Men have always done this since the
beginning of civilization.

Women have always worked, but it was usually at home
or selling in markets (not just their bodies). So, the
later part of the 20th century should be of no
surprise not should it be glorified. Women have always
worked, albeit they were usually older women whose
children had grown or widowed women or women who were
single without children or women who were married
without children.

But, the statistics show that from the beginning of
civilization to as late as 1905 A.D., 95% of women
with a child stayed home to be with their children and
home-schooled them for intellignece and took them to
church and other social events to develop the child's
social skills.

Then later on in the 20th century, women started
working outside the home. It is now known that women
go to work every day for themselves and the children.
A woman does not have her man in mind as she works.

Women do not really love men. The Titanic proved this
without doubt. Men really do care. Men care more. They
give their lives for women. They always have. And
women turn their heads and change the subject when it
comes to men giving their lives for their woman - and
women never giving their life for their man.

Men even put up with PMS and constant complaining and
defaming and screaming - even though they have the
absolute power to place a woman in prison for these
blood pressure raising acts of patheticism (womens
blood pressure does not rise during domestic arguing).

A woman tells a man she loves him. But then she has
children and her love for him was only superficial.

She soon finds that she just wants to work and be
with the kids. She thinks to herself and receives the
advice of her peers and the conclusion for the
solution is,
__________________________

Dear man,

Thank you for giving me children. But,goodbye,man. All
men are bastards. A woman needs a man like a fish
needs a bicycle. And the kids will be okay without a
father. Women and children need a man like fish needs
a bicycle - even though research has proven otherwise.

___________________________


If a person believes in the bible, it is quite obvious
that feminism began in the garden of Eden when Eve was
away from her husband by choice.

And then the root of feminism expanded on a larger
scale when men invented the automobile.

And then came the latter half of the 20th century.

Women in the 20th century invented Complete Womyns
Lib.

*****

Women's Lib = Complete Women's Liberation =

Womyns Liberation Organization =

opposing army =

sleeping with the enemy.

*****

Eve actually had paradise ..... paradise .....

but she even in paradise - the she was not content.

Women are always behind (and copycats)- WNBA
(basketball), women's billiards, women's chess,
women's golf (and they are so against all an male golf
club - where men could not care less about an all
woman golf club), women's auxillary this and women's
auxillary that, etc.

When will women invent something on their own and
stop being a copycat? Answer: In reality....never.

And the issue of Men's Clubs. Second class is obvious
since men ..... never never never ... ever .... want
to join women's clubs.

But women just pant and rave for inclusion in the boys
treehouse.

Women complain and complain and complain and pant and
pant and pant to get on the football sidelines, the
all male locker-room, and anywhere else a boys club or
boys treehouse is.

Is this pathetisim?

Is this second class?

Is this an inferiority complex?

American women should take a good look in the mirror.
The finger pointing should begin in the mirror.

On earth there are producers ..... and there are
complainers. Producers are too busy producing to
complain. Complainers are too busy complaining to
produce.

American women should really and truly practice a
respect for men and face the truth - women are not
equal. Women were never equal were in the past - and
they never will be in the future - unless of course
the hands and minds of men find a cure for the second
team double minded inferior complexed.

Hollywood - is not reality. Just ask China the female
wrestler - who worked out every day - a world renowned
athlete - she got her butt kicked by 46 year fat,
overweight, out of shape, horribly unpopular old Joey
Butafuco in a boxing match on Celebrity Boxing. She
got man-handled by a pathetically out of shape and
over-weight loser. Again, she is a world renowned
athlete in perfect physical shape. And she is not a
small woman. She is tall with muscles and she shows
(or did until after boxing match) those muscles off
every time she gets in front of a camera.

And speaking of boxing? The truth is (and truth is a
woman's worst enemy and a non-topic and a reason for
frightened female scorn if mentioned), if a women does
win in boxing - never in Karate or ultimate fighting -
then it is because there are only 6 rounds of boxing.
Any 'body' - can swing padded boxing gloves for 6
rounds. And, really, men do not feel comfortable
boxing a woman. The truth is, 95% of all 20 year old
women can not defeat 95% of all 50 year old men if it
becomes serious. Battered Women's shelters prove this
when their records are examined.

There are no Battered Men's Shelters.

What part of this reality do women not understand?

Men hit with their fists.

Women hit with words.And women's mouths get them in
trouble with men. In your face is the reason there are
battered women's shelters.

Without question, men should go to jail for hitting
women.

But, since boys are taught on the school grounds to
not hit girls, little girls should be taught to not
lift their voice to boys.

And without question, women should go to jail for
getting in a man's face.

This would save many marriages and deaths from heart
attacks and violence.

If given a choice, men would not become a woman for
all the money, and diamonds, and gold that could be
found on all the earth.

To the contrary, women go to the ends of the earth to
try to act, talk, dress, and even be a man. And they
would give anything if only they could have been born
a man.

Perhaps women should stop complaining about those
types of 'persons' that women themselves dream and
crave of being.

Feminism is a lie.

Women can not do anything a man can do - and because
they do not - this is proof that they can not.

Feminism is built on the sands of popularism.

The tide is washing away feminism.

Decade by decade - we see the non-contributions of
women to humanity.

Little by little we see through the facade - the
fakery - mask.

What is behind the mask?

A joyless person.

A loveless person.

A cheater. A complainer. A lier. A hater. A killer. A
pervert. A creep. A judger. A lazy. A pouter. A taker.

A non-deserver.

A second place person.

A pathetic.

Men rule the world.

Women do not rule - nor do they deserve to.

And, women do not deserve the right to vote.

They are not allowed to be drafted.

They are not allowed to vote.

This is fairness and integrity.

Women: No Draft - No Vote