« good for the goose | Main | Test »
The worm crawls in
The worm crawls out
You can't stomach
What comes out of his mouth
Is it really evil of me to leave this as the top post all day? Because that sure is one creepy looking image.
Oh, I was thinking. I'd like to start honing my interviewing skills for future use. Any takers?
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference sorry:
» One More Reason I Won't be Visiting France from Cato the Youngest
Insulting Jacko Chirac can get you a 45,000 euro fine. The Guardian has this report (link via zonitics.com via Instapundit). [Read More]
Comments
We've already established that you're evil. We're just trying to figure out how evil you are.
Posted by: Kinneret | February 26, 2003 08:12 AM
Don't you know that secret government employees aren't allowed to be interviewed? Come on girl, read the manual!
Posted by: Anthony Martin | February 26, 2003 08:56 AM
Will you be the subject or the interviewer?As in media exposure or job app?
Posted by: mbruce | February 26, 2003 11:03 AM
I will be conducting interviews.
Posted by: michele | February 26, 2003 11:04 AM
I'm game. Just no creepy worm pictures. Centipede, yes. Worm, no.
Posted by: Justin DuCote` | February 26, 2003 11:04 AM
I will, but you must allow me to have one of my people present to record the proceedings as well.
Posted by: Joe | February 26, 2003 11:23 AM
Rubber hoses?Bright lights?electrical stimulation?ooooh.count me in
Posted by: mbruce | February 26, 2003 11:33 AM
Sure, I'll take you up on the interview thing. Not that I am a person of any importance whatsoever, but if it gives you good practice I'd be glad to help.
Posted by: Kevin Parrott | February 26, 2003 11:48 AM
The slur-du-jour: "Chickenhawks" - and the hypocrisy of the anti-war left . . .
. . . are plain to see in this all-too-typical mean-spirtied smear/post on Eschaton. Atrios, like the rest of the anti-war left, denigrates all advocates of actual disarmament of Iraq via military action - which advocates are not present or former members of the military - as "chickenhawks."
So, Atrios: to advocate military action as part of foreign policy, a person must be a present or former member of the military? Otherwise they're a "chickenhawk"?
Wow. Great idea. Good thing we didn't apply that standard to - oh, say - Woodrow Wilson, FDR, or Bill Clinton. (You might recall that there was a wee bit of miltary action advocated and carried out by these Democrat Presidents - none of whom served in the military).
Are you saying that Woodrow Wilson, FDR, and Bill Clinton were all "chickenhawks"?
Oh, right - you guys are just Bush-haters. I was taking one of your arguments seriously for a minute . . .
(Although, you didn't really present an "argument." As usual, you just tossed out a mean-spirited slur, totally lacking any substance . . .)
Posted by: nikita demosthenes | February 26, 2003 12:05 PM
how did a warm hearted post about worms turn into a debate about chickenhawks? people need to lighten up.
Posted by: alex kidd | February 26, 2003 01:30 PM
The image can be greatly enhanced by speeding it up.
Posted by: Cracker Barrel Philosopher | February 27, 2003 02:24 PM
Fair words break no bones...
Posted by: Bertram | June 14, 2004 08:54 PM