« special guest | Main | up in the hot tub, bubbly »

glitter: a review via webster's

Glitter: A review via Webster's


aw·ful (ôfl)
adj.
Extremely bad or unpleasant; terrible

Yet, as with Showgirls, I sat through the whole thing.

Posted by on August 31, 2002 09:45 PM |

Comments

I spotted that that was on HBO earlier. I shivered and I quickly scrolled down the list of show options. You are a much braver woman then I am.

Posted by: Christine | August 31, 2002 10:11 PM

Showgirls really does get better over time though, doesn't it?

Posted by: jason | September 1, 2002 02:10 AM

Jason, no it doesn't. By a series of bizarre television accidents I've seen it three times and it get worse every time.

Posted by: Nicklas | September 1, 2002 06:43 AM

Yet you have watched it each time, Nicklas. As have we all.

Posted by: michele | September 1, 2002 08:13 AM

Showgirls is so bad it's funny. Glitter doesn't have the T&A factor that Showgirls did, so I suspect it's even worse.

Posted by: Scott | September 1, 2002 09:33 AM

Glitter followed by Showgirls?

For the love of...WHY? WHY??!?

Why put yourself through that punishment?

Posted by: John | September 1, 2002 11:53 PM

Hello. If you are owner of this site, delete this message, please.

bairontechnologiesforall
bairontechnologiesforall
http://www.bairontechnologiesforall.biz

Posted by: Bairon Bancks | October 20, 2004 07:38 PM